Peter Buxtun, Hero Who Exposed Tuskegee Syphilis Study, Passes Away at 86

Peter Buxtun, Hero Who Exposed Tuskegee Syphilis Study, Passes Away at 86

At the age of 86, Peter Buxtun, the whistleblower who bravely exposed one of the most well-known medical research scams in American history, has gone away.

Buxtun, who passed away in Rocklin, California, on May 18 due to Alzheimer's disease, is revered as a hero by both public health experts and legislators for his crucial contribution to the termination of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. His attorney, Minna Farnan, attested to his passing.

Federal scientists started the Tuskegee Syphilis Study in 1932, which entailed observing 400 Black males in Tuskegee, Alabama, who had syphilis. Federal health officials deliberately delayed the use of antibiotics when they became available in the 1940s, preferring to track the disease's unregulated growth over time. This flagrant breach of ethics persisted until Buxtun's efforts caused it to be terminated in 1972.

Buxtun, a federal public health officer in San Francisco at the time, learned about the research from a coworker in the mid-1960s. He was disturbed and started looking into the experiment's ethical ramifications. Although the study was not entirely hidden—roughly a dozen research publications have already been published—the methodology was not subject to much examination. According to MWCD, Ted Pastorius of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) emphasized that the American medical community had widely embraced it during an event honoring the study's conclusion in 2022.

Buxtun expressed his concerns to CDC authorities in a 1966 letter as a result of his moral fury. He was mocked for his fixation on moral behavior after his objections were turned down. Buxtun was so frustrated that he quit the Public Health Service to go to law school, but he wasn't going to give up on finding the truth. He gave important papers to AP writer Edith Lederer in 1972, which prompted AP investigative reporter Gene Heller to launch an inquiry.

The project was terminated within four months after congressional hearings, a significant class-action lawsuit that ended in a $10 million settlement, and an explosive piece by Heller that was published on July 25, 1972, revealed the study's inhumanity. As a result of the disclosure, the American government was compelled to reevaluate its methods for conducting medical research. President Bill Clinton issued a formal apology for the study in 1997, calling it "shameful."

Lily Tyson Head, whose father took part in the study, thanked Buxtun for his courage. She remarked, "We appreciate his courage and honesty."

Buxtun, who was born in Prague in 1937, escaped Nazi-occupied Czechoslovakia with his family and finally made their way to Irish Bend, Oregon. When Buxtun later connected the Tuskegee research to the medical experimentation carried out by Nazi scientists, it struck a deep chord since his father was Jewish. Federal officials initially objected to this comparison, but when the data was made public, they established new ethical standards for medical research. The Tuskegee Study is still frequently used to explain why African Americans are distrustful of medicine today.

Before entering the Federal Health Service in 1965, Buxtun worked as a mental social worker and combat medic in the U.S. Army. She also had a strong interest in antiquities and history. He was a world traveler and well-known for his knowledge of military relics from the California Gold Rush.

Buxtun's friends and coworkers recall him for his moral rectitude, humor, and insight. David M. Golden, a close friend of Peter's for 25 years, described him as "wisdom, wit, classy, and endlessly generous." Another close friend, Angie Bailey, remembered how moved Buxtun would get when he gave talks on the Tuskegee Study.

When asked where he got the moral bravery to reveal the findings at a Johns Hopkins University discussion in 2018, Buxtun sheepishly said, "It wasn't a strength." That was a foolish move.

The legacy of Peter Buxtun is proof of the strength of a single person's conviction in the face of institutional injustice. His commitment to moral openness and fairness has had a lasting impact on medical research and public health.

Back to blog

Leave a comment

Leave A Comment
    1 out of ...